We Only Sell to Smart People?

In my opinion, a lot of product and engineering managers in hi-tech are unwittingly hostile to potential customers. Their attitude, almost incredibly, can be misinterpreted to mean: “If prospects aren’t smart enough to understand our products, they do not deserve to buy them.” While no one ever said this in actual words, the constant conflict over how to market products and services indicates there is something under-the-surface.

One submerged aspect is revealed in the question: How you shop for technology?

  • Engineers and product managers have the intellectual capacity to review detailed specifications and make rational assessments of which products/services perform best.
  • Executives, on the other hand, often focus on productivity and efficiency enhancements. They may not understand the technical details, but they respect and understand cost/benefit analyses — especially when costs can be reduced.
  • Mid-managers with operational responsibilities take the broadest view of all three by considering how technology will affect processes and staffing. It’s may seem illogical, but mid-managers will gladly choose a product that is technically inferior if the selling company is easy to work with, provides excellent training/support, and takes ownership of the employee change management process.

I’ve head these three groups called “tribes” within a corporation: The Executive Tribe, Operational Tribe, and Technical Tribe. The starkly contrasting values of these three tribes can be seen in their answer to a basic question: “What are people?”

  • To members of the Executive tribe, people are expensive.
  • To the Operations tribe, people are how you get anything accomplished.
  • To the Technical tribe, people are single largest source of error.

Moral of Story: The companies that can address the values and concerns of these three tribes will be far more successful selling to large enterprises and agencies.

Image courtesy of GIPHY

Extreme Corporate Laziness?

I’m all for avoiding unnecessary work. I got an email from the bank that issues my airline credit card. They wanted me to provide updated housing and income information.

Naturally, I suspected this was a phishing scam. But, a careful review of the email headers and links showed they were truly from the bank in question.

So, it got me to thinking: What a bunch lazy so-and-so’s.* On the surface that might seem like a mundane request. However, this particular bank also has the mortgage on my house, receives my payroll check through ACH automatic deposit, and provides me with a free credit score every month. If anyone should know my housing and income situation it’s the very bank asking for these data.

To compound the laziness, every year I get a pamphlet that reminds me I cannot opt-out of the bank sharing information with their subsidiaries and vendors who provide contracted services. For example, I cannot opt-out of the retail banking division sharing my payroll deposit status with the credit-card division. Likewise, I cannot opt-out of the mortgage services division sharing my mortgage status with the credit-card division.

Alas, it appears that banks simply do not leverage customer information to provide a unified and integrated user experience. Despite the trillions of dollars banks have invested in computer systems, we are still stuck in the 1980s when it comes to customer service. Call the wrong department and one is flatly told “I cannot help you.” Sometimes they won’t even transfer you, but make you hang-up and call a different number.

The dictionary definition of “lazy” is “unwilling to work or use energy.” Yes, that seems to fit in my opinion.

* My 7th grade homeroom teacher never lost his temper nor used an obscenity. “So-and-so’s” was his all purpose phrase for those beneath contempt (lol). I used it in my blog post our respect for this fine man.

 

Image via GIPHY